<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hazel McHaffie &#187; Direct Red</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/tag/direct-red/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog</link>
	<description>Hazel McHaffie's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Elephants and ethics &#8211; who&#8217;s right?</title>
		<link>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2010/02/11/elephants-and-ethics-whos-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2010/02/11/elephants-and-ethics-whos-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hazel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dead Tomorrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elephants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLEUBE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I’m still here! Transpennine Express got me safely to Manchester and back even though they didn’t think it important to have any heating in February now the snow’s gone. And there was no coach E, so my seat reservation was a tad meaningless. But I found a seat anyway and got Direct Red by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I’m still here! Transpennine Express got me safely to Manchester and back even though they didn’t think it important to have any heating in February now the snow’s gone. And there was no coach E, so my seat reservation was a tad meaningless. But I found a seat anyway and got <em><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;field-keywords=Direct+Red&amp;x=12&amp;y=19">Direct Red</a></em> by Gabriel Weston read at last. My frozen feet kept me nicely awake. This surgeon’s tale of her early experiences as a doctor, has been on my list for ages, so it was good to finally have it at the top of the pile. Having worked in hospitals for decades myself the stories resonated, and these are refreshingly honest and humble.</p>
<p>As for my presentation on the place of fiction in bioethics, well, suffice it to say the listening bioethicists didn’t eat me alive. But their minds are definitely on a more exalted plane than mine. They tease out words and ideas and just revel in arguments about what exactly constitutes bioethics; who’s in the circle, who’s out; whether it’s right or wrong to have cctv monitoring or assisted suicide or films giving only part of the picture on one of life’s big questions; what exactly Aristotle was getting at; whether artists should be allowed to shock people … all good exercise for my little grey cells. Just this once! You can <a href="http://www.facebook.com/gleube">read all about it</a> if you&#8217;re interested.</p>
<p>The fact that we all see the world in different ways depending on where we stand and how observant and sensitive we are to different things was summed up nicely in this poem by John Godfrey Saxe:</p>
<div id="attachment_399" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 400px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-399" href="http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2010/02/11/elephants-and-ethics-whos-right/4296091152_97f920a8f7/"><img class="size-medium wp-image-399  " title="Elephant" src="http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/4296091152_97f920a8f7-300x250.jpg" alt="Elephant" width="390" height="325" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image <em>Jumbo</em> by Piet Grobler from Flickr used under Creative Commons</p></div>
<p>It was six men of Indostan<br />
To learning much inclined,<br />
Who went to see the Elephant<br />
(Though all of them were blind),<br />
That each by observation<br />
Might satisfy his mind.</p>
<p>The First approached the Elephant<br />
And happening to fall<br />
Against his broad and sturdy side,<br />
At once began to bawl:<br />
‘God bless me! but the Elephant<br />
Is like a very wall!’</p>
<p>The Second, feeling of the tusk,<br />
Cried, ‘Ho, what have we here<br />
So very round and smooth and sharp?<br />
To me ’tis mighty clear<br />
This wonder of an Elephant<br />
Is very like a spear!’</p>
<p>The Third approached the animal,<br />
And happening to take<br />
The squirming trunk within his hands,<br />
Thus boldly up and spake<br />
‘I see,’ quote he, ‘the Elephant<br />
Is very like a snake!’</p>
<p>The Fourth reached out an eager hand<br />
And felt about the knee.<br />
‘What most this wondrous beast is like<br />
Is mighty plain,’ quoth he;<br />
’Tis clear enough the Elephant<br />
Is very like a tree!’</p>
<p>The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear,<br />
Said, ‘E’en the blindest man<br />
Can tell what this resembles most;<br />
Deny the fact who can.<br />
This marvel of an Elephant<br />
Is very like a fan!’</p>
<p>The Sixth no sooner had begun<br />
About the beast to grope,<br />
Than, seizing on the swinging tail<br />
That fell within his scope,<br />
‘I see,’ quoth he, ‘the Elephant<br />
Is very like a rope!’</p>
<p>And so these men of Indostan<br />
Disputed loud and long,<br />
Each in his own opinion<br />
Exceeding stiff and strong,<br />
Though each was partly in the right,<br />
And all were in the wrong!</p>
<p>So oft in theologic* wars,<br />
The disputants, I ween,<br />
Rail on in utter ignorance<br />
Of what each other mean<br />
And prate about an Elephant<br />
Not one of them has seen!</p>
<p>*substitute bioethic or scientific or moralistic or whatever. Because the moral applies to all of us in one context or another, doesn’t it?</p>
<p>Hey ho, I return more than ever humbled by my own ignorance. And I confess, relieved to have that experience safely behind me. I can now bend my mind to other things … like family problems in Devon, so I’m off down there for the rest of the week. It takes a full day on the train each way, which means at least two books ticked off my still-to-read list – other people’s mobile phones and conversations permitting. I’m taking <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;field-keywords=February&amp;x=10&amp;y=18"><em>February</em></a> by Lisa Moore and <em><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&amp;field-keywords=Dead+Tomorrow&amp;x=19&amp;y=20">Dead Tomorrow</a></em> by Peter James. An unexpected bonus. They&#8217;ve been tempting me for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2010/02/11/elephants-and-ethics-whos-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

