<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hazel McHaffie &#187; journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/tag/journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog</link>
	<description>Hazel McHaffie's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:56:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I may be mistaken &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2009/04/30/i-may-be-mistaken/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2009/04/30/i-may-be-mistaken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hazel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nun's prayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been quite overwhelmed by the response to my new blog. Many thanks to all of you who have so generously commented. Writing can be a lonely occupation and it’s reassuring to know there are real people out there who read and who care. I even had one email this week from someone in Canada [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been quite overwhelmed by the response to my new blog. Many thanks to all of you who have so generously commented. Writing can be a lonely occupation and it’s reassuring to know there are real people out there who read and who care. I even had one email this week from someone in Canada who shares the same unusual surname &#8211; a rare affliction!</p>
<h2>Thanks</h2>
<p>But special thanks go to Lindsay in Glasgow who challenged me in an unexpected way. The exchange went something like this:<br />
L: ‘Would you say you’ve got strong views on ethical issues?’<br />
H: ‘Well, I’ve got strong views on the importance of debate about ethical issues, but the longer I work in this area the more shades of grey I see.’<br />
L: ‘That’s what I thought from everything you write. So why does your blog say you have strong views on the actual issues?’<br />
H: ‘I didn’t think it did.’<br />
L: ‘I think it does. At the end of that interview about “Who’s your favourite author?”’</p>
<p>Of course, I went hot foot to my blog and that link to the said interview (<a href="http://www.sundayherald.com/search/display.var.2476849.0.books_stories_of_my_life.php">stories-of-my-life</a>). After all, my reputation’s on the line here. Even-handed, that’s me. Leave-the-reader-to-form-their-own-conclusions: that’s my style. Had I really been careless enough to shoot myself in the foot here?</p>
<p>Whoops! There it was.</p>
<p><strong>Q. Do you have strong opinions on the ethical questions facing your characters?</strong><br />
A. Having worked in the field of ethics for decades, the more I know about these complex issues the more I&#8217;m conscious of the grey areas. When I get inside the skin of my characters facing difficult choices I see different perspectives which may require different solutions, because our value systems, beliefs and experiences influence what we see as right or wrong. In <em>Right To Die</em>, Adam is an analytical journalist weighing up the value of his disintegrating life. His mother is rigidly religious, with hang-ups about suicide. His GP is influenced by a strong professional moral code. Who&#8217;s right? Who&#8217;s to say? <em>So the answer is, yes</em> (my italics).</p>
<p>My reaction evolved slowly.<br />
Stage 1. Chagrin. Mortification. Annoyance (with myself I hasten to add).<br />
Stage 2. Pause for reflection. I try to think myself back. Why did I say that?<br />
Stage 3. Apology to Lindsay with promise to do better in future.<br />
Stage 4. Good night’s sleep. Subconscious works on issue.<br />
Stage 5. Revisit original interview.<br />
For once I’m glad I haven’t had time to tidy up the files on my computer. Because there it is!</p>
<h3>The answer</h3>
<p>The set of questions I’d been asked during that interview had inexplicably changed when they reached the printed page. The original question was:<br />
<strong>Q. As a medical ethicist, are there any issues you are still uncertain about?</strong><br />
A: As above.<br />
And of course the answer to that question is emphatically yes!</p>
<p>So a big thank you to Lindsay for giving me the opportunity to right a great wrong. And for a timely reminder of that paragraph in the <a href="http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/11340.htm">17th Century Nun’s prayer</a>:</p>
<p><em>‘I dare not ask for improved memory, but for a growing humility and a lessing cocksureness when my memory seems to clash with the memories of others. Teach me the glorious lesson that occasionally I may be mistaken.&#8217;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hazelmchaffie.com/blog/2009/04/30/i-may-be-mistaken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

