Hazel McHaffie

Nineteen Minutes

To write or not to write? that is the question

As I indicated last week, it’s an ongoing preoccupation with me – will readers want to immerse themselves in dark, melancholic tales? The issues I tackle all have this side to them, and each time I have to work hard at achieving a healthy balance; each time I worry: have I got it right?

Take Right to Die. Right to DieFor those of you who haven’t read it, it tells the story of a young man, Adam, who develops Motor Neurone Disease when he’s only 38. He knows he will die within a couple of years or so. Yep, plenty of scope for low spirits there, and I confess I still can’t read it without weeping myself. But then, I know Adam intimately. I lived with him for several years, and his spirit lingers with me. It’s personal.

the bookclub ladiesSo it was tremendously warming last Thursday to be invited to put in a guest appearance at a book club, and hear that, though they feared the worst, the members didn’t find the book at all depressing. They were so generous about it, and we had a wonderfully uplifting evening analysing why not, and teasing out the components of a book that ensure a good read. Yes, we did discuss the pros and cons of assisted dying along the way, but also what made Adam warm to the colourful Jamaican physio Lydia, but not the texbook perfect Veronique. Do exemplary GPs like Hugo Curtis really exist? Why did the cat have to die? What was really going on in that closed room between the GP and his patient? Do we smell romance between two of the principle characters? Very confirming. And such fun. I salute you, ladies! (Apologies for the poor quality photo – it doesn’t do you justice.)

This got me thinking about other books of a similar complexion. You know the kind of thing: Lionel Shriver’s We Need to Talk about Kevin;  Jodi Picoult’s Nineteen Minutes; Alice Sebold’s The Lovely Bones et al. And no, those novels didn’t depress me either. Why not? Because the macabre subjects (teenage massacres, rape and murder) were handled so skilfully, the stories so well told. I was challenged but not crushed.

Which brings me to Jeffrey Eugenides. MiddlesexI read and loved his wonderful book on hermaphroditism, Middlesex, ages ago. So when I saw his earlier novel, The Virgin Suicides, I snapped it up. This week it rose to the top of my pile and I devoured it in two sittings.

It’s not in the same league as Middlesex, but still worth reading. Basically it tells the story of the five adolescent Lisbon sisters who all commit suicide. Dark material? Positively ink black. The girls grow up in an eccentric and isolated environment. They’ve become an object of fascination to the local boys who watch them from various vantage points, and even on one memorable occasion, entice four of them out a joint date – the only one they were ever allowed. The narrator is one of these lads who, now grown up, looks back at the unfolding saga as if he’s compiling evidence for what happened, and searching for a plausible explanation.

Hmm. Teenage suicide, self harming – definitely not cheery bedtime reading, I think we’d all agree, so why is it so entertaining? Well, the tone, the style of writing, the irony, the humour of each situation, bring a light touch that seems to take the sting out of the essential tragedy, diverting attention and setting a broader canvas against which the lives of these doomed girls are played. Hard to describe so I’ll try to illustrate what I mean.

We aren’t worrying all the time about terrible happenings jumping out at us just as we start to get attached to the characters. Come to think of it, I didn’t form an attachment to any of them. We know from the outset that they will all die as you can see from the opening sentence.

On the morning the last Lisbon daughter took her turn at suicide – it was Mary this time, and sleeping pills, like Therese – the two paramedics arrived at the house knowing exactly where the knife drawer was, and the gas oven, and the beam in the basement from which it was possible to tie a rope.

And we also know early on that we are in sure hands. From Eugenides’ account of the girls’ intentions:

And it was then Cecilia gave orally what was to be her only form of suicide note … ‘Obviously, Doctor,’ she said, ‘you’ve never been a thirteen-year-old girl.’

… and even of the deed itself:

Through a side window we could see Mr Lisbon standing in the shrubbery. When we came out the front door we saw that he was holding Cecilia, one hand under her neck and the other under her knees. He was trying to lift her off the spike that had punctured her left breast, traveled through her inexplicable heart, separated two vertebrae without shattering either, and come out her back, ripping the dress and finding air again. The spike had gone through so fast there was no blood on it. It was perfectly clean and Cecilia merely seemed balanced on the pole like a gymnast. The fluttering wedding dress added to this circusy effect. Mr Lisbon kept trying to lift her off, gently, but even in our ignorance we knew it was hopeless and that despite Cecilia’s open eyes and the way her mouth kept contracting like that of a fish on a stringer it was just nerves and she had succeeded, on the second try, in hurling herself out of the world.

… and the funeral:

Only the family filed past the coffin. First the girls walked past, each dazed and expressionless, and, later, people said we should have known by their faces. ‘It was like they were giving her a wink,’ Mrs Carruthers said. ‘They should have been bawling, but what did they do? Up to the coffin, peek in, and away. Why didn’t we see it?’ Curt Van Osdol, the only kid at the Funeral Home, said he would have copped a last feel, right there in front of the priest and everybody, if only we had been there to appreciate it. After the girls passed by, Mrs Lisbon, on her husband’s arm, took ten stricken steps to dangle her weak head over Cecilia’s face, rouged for the first and last time ever. ‘Look at her nails,’ Mr Burton thought he heard her say. ‘Couldn’t they do something about her nails?’ And then Mr Lisbon replied: ‘They’ll grow on. Fingernails keep growing. She can’t bite them now, dear.’

This concentration on seemingly unconnected and disproportionately trivial points fits with the narrator’s original naive understanding of what was really happening. The tragedy of five teenage suicides in one family, of the subsequent disintegration, is subsumed under a welter of information about swarms of fish flies, and cats yowling, and unearthly smells, and protests about tree felling, and boys trying to glimpse girls in various states of undress – the preoccupations of adolescent youths. In this case a very clever tactic for counter balancing the horror of the Lisbon tragedies. The more adult understanding that comes from later interviews with neighbours, teachers, parents; the piecing together of exhibits which make sense of the seemingly incomprehensible, is titrated in as necessary in order to create a cohesive picture of what was really going on.

Reading this, analysing it, was like a mini master class for me. Would that I had this kind of skill. It also made me see that dark topics need not be off limits.

 

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

School massacres

Think of the small cathedral city of Dunblane and two things come to mind: an appalling school massacre, and Andy Murray, one of the survivors.

Andy Murray is carving out his own niche in sporting history, trying not to think of the day when, aged just eight, he hid under a table with his brother to avoid the eye and gun of Thomas Hamilton, the former local Scout leader whom he knew.

But memories of 13 March 1996, when Hamilton walked into a primary school and shot dead sixteen children and a teacher, are still vivid in the minds of the people of Scotland.

Dunblane is only about 35 miles from where I live; that’s the closest I’ve come to this horror in real life. I’ve visited the city since 1996 and felt the impact of its shocking claim to fame hidden under the pretty exterior.

And at snowdrop time it’s fitting to pause and remember.

The Snowdrop campaign was founded in the aftermath of the Dunblane massacre to call for a total ban on the private ownership and use of handguns in the United Kingdom.

My heart goes out to everyone who’s known the reality of such a catastrophe personally. The city, the community, the families, will never be the same again. But spare a thought, also, for the relatives of the killers who perpetrate these terrible acts. Their lives too are decimated. And who will give them a hug, lay flowers at their door, send them a sympathy card, make allowances?

I’ve read several novels about school massacres – We Need to Talk about Kevin and Nineteen Minutes stay with me. Disturbing tales, cleverly crafted, gripping in a macabre sort of way. More recently Rupture caught my attention.

This is Simon Lelic’s debut novel – and what a debut. Reviews have been mixed, but in my opinion it’s unusual, taut, gritty. And challenging.

In the midst of a sweltering hot summer in London, a young history teacher, Samuel Szajkowski, walks into his school assembly and opens fire, killing three pupils and a colleague before turning the gun on himself. An open and shut case; there are more than a hundred witnesses.

Lucia May, the police inspector assigned to the investigation, is expected to wrap up the report smartly. But Lucia becomes obsessed with the questions no-one else wants to ask: what drove this polite, shy man to commit this horrific crime? She starts delving. And she really listens. Her own experience of institutional harassment gives her the courage to defy everyone who wants to stop her doing so. And then schoolboy Elliot Samson commits suicide … her resolve hardens.

What makes this book so different is the style of writing. We hear the evidence as the inspector hears it, streams of words from each witness, without interruption or interjection. Such is the power of the story-telling that Lelic doesn’t even tell us directly who is speaking as the case gradually builds – a picture so chilling, so ugly, and yet so cleverly manipulated that it’s doubtful if justice will ever prevail.

Abuse, bullying, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia – they’re all there, and yet the issues themselves aren’t allowed to overshadow the story-line.

If I have a criticism it’s that the profanities are rather overdone. Oh, and the conventional third person sections are weaker than the witnesses’ accounts. And the ending is clumsy and unfinished. But in spite of all that, overall I was gripped by the story and didn’t want it to end.

I do read cheerful books too, honestly! It’s just that the dark and chilling, lend themselves to sharing bloggy kinds of thoughts on VelvetEthics.

, , , , , , ,

Comments